PCB Impedance Calculator
Estimate microstrip, stripline, grounded coplanar or differential impedance, or solve a microstrip width for a target. Each mode uses a stated closed-form approximation; final geometry depends on the actual stackup. IPC currently lists IPC-2141 as “No Longer Maintained”, so it is used here only as a historical/reference formula source.
Method based on IPC-2141A (2004; IPC lists the document as No Longer Maintained) · editorial check September 2026 · method Piecewise quasi-static microstrip approximation · revision 1.1
Microstrip and stripline cross-sections
Microstrip width for common targets on FR-4
| Target Z0 | W / H | Interpretation |
|---|---|---|
| 40 Ω | 2.78 | Single-ended example target |
| 50 Ω | 1.96 | Single-ended example target |
| 60 Ω | 1.42 | Single-ended example target |
| 75 Ω | 0.91 | Single-ended example target |
| 90 Ω | 0.60 | Single-ended example target |
| 100 Ω | 0.45 | Single-ended example target |
When a trace becomes a transmission line
At low frequencies a trace is just a wire. Once the signal's rise time is short enough that the trace is an appreciable fraction of a wavelength, the trace behaves as a transmission line and its characteristic impedance starts to matter. Mismatched impedance reflects energy back along the line, which shows up as ringing, overshoot and, on fast serial links, a closed eye and intermittent failures.
Characteristic impedance is set by the cross-section geometry: the trace width, the height to the reference plane, the copper thickness and the dielectric constant. It does not depend on the trace length.
Microstrip versus stripline
A microstrip runs on an outer layer with a single reference plane beneath it, so part of its field is in the board and part is in the air. That makes it easy to route and probe, but it radiates more and is sensitive to whatever sits above it. A stripline runs on an inner layer between two planes, fully inside the dielectric: better shielded and quieter, but it needs inner-layer routing and its field is entirely in the laminate, so its effective permittivity equals the full dielectric constant.
For microstrip, H is the trace-to-reference-plane dielectric height. For the symmetric stripline approximation, B is the total spacing between the two planes. Neither dimension should be replaced with overall board thickness unless it actually matches the stackup.
The microstrip approximation used here
The microstrip engine uses piecewise thin-conductor equations, with a separate effective-permittivity approximation. It is not the complete Hammerstad–Jensen model.
The calculation omits finite-copper-thickness corrections, solder mask and frequency-dependent dispersion. The width solver accepts W/H from 0.1 to 10 and checks that the target is bracketed and the solution converges. These are implementation limits, not an accuracy guarantee.
Differential pairs and field solvers
A differential pair carries equal and opposite signals on two coupled traces. The differential impedance comes from the single-ended impedance of one trace plus the coupling between the pair, set by the spacing. This tool reports the differential, odd, even and common-mode values for an edge-coupled microstrip pair.
Closed-form differential models disagree with each other by ten to twenty-five percent, more than the spread on single-ended formulas. Treat the differential number as a starting point for sizing and confirm the final geometry against your fabricator's field solver and stackup, which are authoritative.
Worked examples
Real sizing calls, and the number that decides each one.
| Scenario | Result | Why |
|---|---|---|
| 50 Ω microstrip on FR-4 (er 4.3) | W/H about 1.95 | The trace width needs to be roughly twice the height to the reference plane; effective permittivity is about 3.3, between air and the laminate. |
| That same 50 Ω line, signal delay | about 153 ps/inch | Propagation delay scales with the square root of effective permittivity; at about 3.3 a signal takes roughly 153 ps to cross each inch. |
| W/H = 1 microstrip on FR-4 | about 72 Ω | Halving the width-to-height ratio from the 50 Ω point raises impedance to about 72 Ω. Impedance is set by the cross-section, not the length. |
How this relates to other standards
| Standard / tool | Relationship | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| PCB trace width calculator | same cross-section | Sets width for current and heat; this tool sets width for impedance. High-speed traces have to satisfy both. |
| Via current capacity | same signal path | Vias break the controlled-impedance reference; keep them short and well-referenced on high-speed nets. |
| Trace resistance | same trace | Resistance governs DC drop and loss; impedance governs reflections. Different limits on the same copper. |
| IPC-2221 | companion standard | IPC-2221C is the actively revised generic board-design standard. IPC-2141A is a historical controlled-impedance guide that IPC currently lists as “No Longer Maintained”. |
Where engineers use this
USB and HDMI routing
USB 2.0 and 3.0 and HDMI run as 90 ohm differential pairs. The tool sizes width and spacing for the target before the layout is committed.
Ethernet, PCIe and SATA
These high-speed serial links route as 100 ohm differential pairs; missing the target by even ten percent degrades the eye diagram at multi-gigabit rates.
RF and 50 ohm lines
Antennas, connectors and most RF building blocks expect a 50 ohm single-ended environment, so microstrip and stripline feeds get sized to 50 ohm.
Specifying a stackup to the fab
Turning a target impedance into a first-pass width and height gives a concrete starting point for the impedance-controlled stackup discussion with the fabricator.
Frequently asked questions
What is characteristic impedance on a PCB?
What width gives 50 ohm on FR-4?
What is the difference between microstrip and stripline?
Why is my calculated impedance different from the fabricator's?
Which dielectric height do I enter?
How accurate is the differential result?
What is grounded coplanar waveguide (CPWG)?
Related tools
Sources: IPC-2141A (2004), historical controlled-impedance guide; IPC revision table lists IPC-2141 as No Longer Maintained · Qucs technical documentation: full Hammerstad-Jensen model, for comparison with the simpler implementation used here · Coplanar waveguide impedance by conformal mapping (Steer, Microwave and RF Design II). Verify against the current edition.